This could be one of them...."
Enron Pipedreams Buried in Afghanistan [freezerbox Mag., BY RON CALLARI, 03/21/02] A MUST READ! POSES QUESTIONS AND THEORIES THE PRESS DOESN'T SEEM TO EVER GET AROUND TO... "...Based on the records available, however, it seems that relationships became strained. The Taliban demanded that the U.S. reconstruct Afghanistan's infrastructure in exchange for building the pipeline, and demanded as well that the pipeline be open for local consumption. The U.S. wanted a closed pipeline that pumped gas for export only, and it had no interest in helping rebuild the country. Negotiations devolved into threats: "we'll either carpet you in gold or carpet you in bombs" became a mantra in the press, one that underscored America's new willfulness at the table. Amid these acrimonious circumstances, sometime in late August, it seems, the whole deal went sour. The pipeline became a no-go.
This left Enron badly exposed. The company had one last card to play, and that was selling the Dabhol plant for quick cash--if it could. If the company could get its asking price of $2.3 billion, then Enron could be pulled out of its bankruptcy nosedive. ..."
Did President Bush Pass Up an Attempt to Get Bin Laden Before 9-11? [Original AP Anchor story was deleted, replaced with one from HistoryNewsNetwork By Thomas Spencer, 02/16/02] Did Bush pass up getting Bin Laden before 9-11 for Oil & Gas Pipelines? According to French investigative reporters Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie, Bush representatives met with the Taliban "several times in Washington, Berlin and Islamabad" to get a deal to build an oil pipeline through Afghanistan. Bush promised a "carpet of gold," but the Taliban had to accept a "national unity" government including the Northern Alliance. If they refused, Bush vowed to "bury you under a carpet of bombs." While negotiations took place, Bush "blocked U.S. secret service investigations on terrorism," prompting FBI Investigation's deputy director John O'Neill to resign in July in protest over the obstruction. O'Neill said "the main obstacles to investigate Islamic terrorism were U.S. oil corporate interests and the role played by Saudi Arabia in it."
Congressional Investigations: Questions That Won't Be Asked[DemocraticUnderground, 03/01/02] The following are critically questions that probably won't be asked:
ENRON'S GLOBAL GAME Beyond the domestic fallout lies a sordid saga of government-business collusion to control energy supplies [Toward Freedom, GREG GUMA, 02/28/02] Implications grow Enron may have been party to threat precipitating 9/11 attack "...Yet still invisible, even now, is the predatory nature of Enron's operations worldwide. Long a suspect in human rights violations, it often used bribery and threats to get its way. It also profited over the years from working relationships with the CIA, Pentagon, and State Department, the latter of which proved over-eager to pressure other countries into accepting Enron deals. And, as if that isn't enough, until recently the US-based energy trader had a strong presence in Afghanistan through its involvement in a pipeline project from Turkmenistan to Turkey by way of Azerbaijan and Georgia."
Enron involved international espionage and electronic spy warfare in Asia, CIA agents were "on payroll"
[National Enquirer, 02/27/02] Feral-humans playing Cowboys and Indians again! "Once again, the National Enquirer has scooped the corporate media with real investigative reporting. "The corruption at Enron went far beyond unbridled greed and rampant sex- it also involved international espionage and electronic spy warfare, the Enquirer has learned... 'There have been at least 20 CIA agents on the payroll of Enron in the past eight years [training] Enron employees in intelligence gathering and security, [helping Enron] get billions of dollars in lucrative contracts in Asia, South America and Europe. 'Basically what the CIA operatives were able to provide was detailed information on bids made by foreign companies on projects of interest to Enron. 'They used human intelligence and also info gleaned from a satellite project called 'Echelon.' The satellites intercepted e-mails, phone calls and faxes with detailed business information... 'Pure and simple, U.S. intelligence agents were involved in corporate espionage.'" We demand a Special Prosecutor!"
US Govt Insiders now beginning to spill the beans on 9-11 / CIA connections {straightgoods, 02/25/02] Stranger than fiction: could U.S. and Saudi zealots for oil wealth and a CIA group have formed an unholy alliance to commit 9-11? Michael Springmann worked for the US government for 20 years with the foreign service and consulate. He just went public with the story of his involvement in a large scale CIA operation that brought hundreds of people from the middle east to the US, issued them passports and trained them to be terrorists. Springmann says that the CIA is working closely with Bin Laden and his operatives in Jeddah and has been since 1987. The most haunting implication from this interview is that all of the terrorist acts of late were planned and paid for by the CIA with US taxpayers money so that the US could legitimately bomb the hell out of Afghanistan. [Includes link to BBC RealPlayer video.]
Minutes of a pre-9/11 Bush inner-cabinet meeting? {truthout, 02/20/02] Introducing 'Shallow Throat" "...P[resident?]: You forget, Don, that we were negotiating with the Taliban just a few months ago, even invited them to Texas. We thought we could convince them to protect the pipelines that our friends want to build through Afghanistan. But those Islams wanted too much money -- imagine, threatening us with sabotage of the pipeline if we didn't cough up the dough." [Editor's comment: Since Bush quotes are not simple sentences I doubt authenticity]
911 Coverup ContinuesGeorge Tenet Crony to Lead Investigation [Reuters, By Tabassum Zakaria, 02/16/02] Choice of a 'buddy' to lead the investigation indicates a cover-up has already been decided upon! Is everyone brain-dead? "Former CIA Inspector General Britt Snider "will head a congressional investigation into U.S. intelligence agency failures related to the Sept. 11 attacks, despite some objections he was too close to the spy agency to have an independent eye..."
1997 Letter from Ken Lay to Bush explaining oil and gas projects in Uzbekistan. More Bush-Lay letters being made available at this site soon. {Letters available at TheSmokingGun, 02/16/02] Read them happily chatting about 'business opportunities' that somehow became a warzone... Note: View letters by clicking hypertext relative number at bottom of pages.
Topic Reference: COPVCIA, by Michael C. Ruppert, 02/15/02: A TIMELINE SURROUNDING SEPTEMBER 11TH if CIA and the government weren't involved in the 9-11 attacks what were they doing? The cover-up of so many damning events is astounding This more complete timeline listing crucial events both before and after the September 11th suicide attacks, which have been blamed on bin Laden, establishes CIA foreknowledge of them and strongly suggests that there was criminal complicity on the part of the U.S. government in their execution. It also makes clear that the events which have taken place since September 11th are based upon an agenda that has little to do with the attacks...One wonders how these events could have been ignored by the major media or treated as isolated incidents. Failing that, how could skilled news agencies avoid being outraged, or at least even just a little suspicious? [Expanded and Revised 2/11/02]
[Story: Reuters, 02/14/02: On Karzai's First Visit to Pakistan, Afghanistan and Pakistan Agree to Build US-Backed Gas Pipeline "Afghanistan's interim leader Hamid Karzai said on Friday he and Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf had agreed to revive a plan for a trans-Afghan gas pipeline from Turkmenistan to Pakistan. 'Both sides have agreed that the construction of this pipeline will be very beneficial for both the countries as well as for the entire region,' Karzai told a news conference after talks with General Musharraf... calling the project 'very essential.' Karzai was in Islamabad on his first official visit to Pakistan...Turkmen President Saparmurat Niyazov, seeking new export outlets for his country's abundant gas reserves, said...'Peace is finally being installed in Afghanistan. And we can now build a pipeline to Pakistan across its territory.' A consortium led by U.S. Unocal had originally aimed to build the $1.9 billion, 1,400-km pipeline." Both Karzai and Zalmay Khalilzad, Bush's Special Envoy to Afghanistan, are former consultants to Unocal. How con-veen-yent!]
[Story: Salon, By NINA BURLEIGH, 02/10/02: Bush, oil and the Taliban "Two French authors allege that before Sept. 11, the White House put oil interests ahead of national security...The book, which has become a bestseller in France but has received little press attention here, also alleges that the Bush administration was bargaining with the Taliban, over a Central Asian oil pipeline and Osama bin Laden, just five weeks before the September attacks. The authors, Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie, see a link between the negotiations and Vice President Dick Cheney's energy policy task force, with its conclusions that Central Asian oil was going to become critical to the U.S. economy."]
[Story: BushWatch Dailybrew, 01/31/02: Ace in the Hole - Soon you'll know why Bush-Cheney want to minimize 9/11 congressional hearings! "If these allegations are aired in Congressional hearings on CSPAN, the Bush administration will have a much bigger scandal on its hands than Enron. If these allegations are proven to be true, the Bush energy policy was much more than crony capitalism and a massive payback to the multi-national corporations that paid for Bush's ascension to the White House. If true, these allegations would show that Bush's energy policy led directly and predictably to the most devastating terrorist attack in history, an attack that caused billions in property damage and cost thousands of innocent Americans their lives."]
[Story: Asia Times, By Pepe Escobar, 01/28/02: Pipelineistan (part 1): The rules of the game "The Afghan War was decided long before September 11. September 11 merely precipitated events. Plans to destroy the Taliban had been the subject of international diplomatic and not-so-diplomatic discussions for months [including] a crucial meeting in Geneva in May 2001 between US State Department, Iranian, German and Italian officials, where the main topic was a strategy to topple the Taliban and replace the theocracy with a 'broad-based government'... at the Group of Eight (G-8) summit in Genoa, Italy, in July 2001 when India... also contributed its own plans... [and] in secret negotiations in a Berlin hotel a few days after the G-8 summit, between American, Russian, German and Pakistani officials. And Pakistani high officials... have extensively described a plan set up by the end of July 2001 by American advisers, consisting of military strikes against the Taliban from bases in Tajikistan, to be launched before mid-October." Also see Part 2: Pipelineistan (part 2): Enron Was A Player In Bush's Dream Of Central Asian Oil]
[**** Recommended]
[Film-clip: Canadian TV breaking 9-11 and CIA complicity query story Monday, January 28, 10:30 pm Eastern Time!!!! A 5 minute introductory segment can be viewed here with realplayer: "What Happened on 9/11 and why aren't the mainstream media asking that question?"]
[Story: Truthout, by William Rivers Pitt, 01/18/02: Bush & Co. may have "Hell to Pay": Perhaps High Treason and Murder "...If these allegations prove true, Bush and his friends allowed this affinity [for oil and a pipeline] to hamstring investigations that could have thwarted bin Laden's September plans. If these allegations prove true, everything since September 11th has been a massive cover-up operation in which American soldiers and thousands of Afghan civilians have died. If these allegations prove true, the Bush administration has the blood of thousands of American civilians on its hands."]
[Story: CNN 01/09/02: CNN "Discovers" (2 months late!) Explosive 'New' Book Published in France Alleges that U.S. Was in Negotiations to Do a Deal with Taliban Transcript: "ZAHN: Start off with what your understanding is of what is in this book -- the most explosive charge.
BUTLER: The most explosive charge, Paula, is that the Bush administration -- the present one, just shortly after assuming office slowed down FBI investigations of al Qaeda and terrorism in Afghanistan in order to do a deal with the Taliban on oil -- an oil pipeline across Afghanistan.
ZAHN: And this book points out that the FBI's deputy director, John O'Neill, actually resigned because he felt the U.S. administration was obstructing...
BUTLER: A proper...
ZAHN: ... the prosecution of terrorism."]
[Story: The Daily Brew 01/09/02: Who Killed John O'Neill? "If you believe the media, John P. O'Neill was simply another innocent victim killed in the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center. But you don't need much imagination to suspect something deeper was at work."]
[Story: Village Voice 01/03/02: Paris Reporters Say Bush Threatened War Last Summer]
[Story: Guardian 12/19/01: CLEARING UP AMERICA'S MESS, New evidence of US dealings with the Taliban highlights the role of oil "The Bush administration may also harbour some guilty secrets over its determination to put America's economic and strategic interests ahead of tracking down Islamist terrorists - at least before September 11...."]
[Story: 12/18/01: U.S. GOVERNMENT KNEW (IN ADVANCE) OF SEPTEMBER 11 ATTACKS;
SENT F.E.M.A. SEARCH & RESCUE TEAMS TO NYC THE NIGHT BEFORE ATTACKS OCCURRED!]
[Story: 11/28/01: WHAT DID THEY KNOW AND WHEN DID THEY KNOW IT? An event & date compilation]
[Story: Toronto Star 11/27/01: Did bin Laden have help from U.S. friends? New book: Ben Laden: La Verité Interdite (Bin Laden: The Forbidden Truth) ...the Bush regime's attitude toward the Taliban - and even to bin Laden - was driven by the new president's fixation on energy.]
[Story: InTheseTimes 11/16/01: QUESTIONABLE TIES, Tracking bin Laden's money flow leads back to Midland, Texas]
[Story: Newsweek 11/13/01: Bracing for a Pearl Harbor Inquiry]
[Story: 11/12/01: 9/11 Cover-up or Complicity of the Bush Administration? Were short- and long-term profiteering the goals at the outset?]
[Story: The CIA Needs to Answer Tough Questions About its Recent Relationship with the Taliban]
[Story: 09/22/01: Threat of US strikes passed to Taliban weeks before NY attack]
[Perspective: Unocal Oil barons courted Taliban in Texas in '97 on this same 'venture'.]